Tuesday, 4 May 2010

The snake pit Council database the “Security Register” and the damage

What are the key conclusions from the litigation of Jane Clift against the Slough Council?

First of all the litigation was totally avoidable and unnecessary. Once Jane Clift had notified the Slough Councils data controller to delete and correct the data sent out about her, because the “potentially violent” slander is inaccurate and because it had caused unwarranted levels of distress and damage in her life all that was needed was for the Council data controller to go ahead and correct the data entry to delete the malicious slander.

If the Slough Council data controller had displayed minimal fairness and sanity to correct the slander about Jane Clift, she was not going to prosecute them for compensation, their refusal to admit wrong doing and correct it made her go all the way through litigation to the end because this database IS A SNAKE PIT. There is no end to suffering as long as a target is being slandered and destroyed to his own GP, the NHS, the Police, the Fire brigade, the Public Libraries, the Career and employment agencies, the schools, all clinics and counseling, and the top fifty companies in each area.

The snake pit database turns the entire society structure against a person and is organized by sick bastards to invite a soft kill lynching of the target. If the administration machine was not made predominantly of sick bastards who cannot cease and desist of secretly slandering and destroying targets using administration secret channels, this case was not going to reach the Courts.

The fact that the Slough Council officials remained fixated to their delusional “rightness” that they had done the right thing, even after they were ordered to pay half a million in costs, they were totally unrepentant, shows that they really are sick bastards and they got to get help from a psychiatrist. No doubt. They are criminally insane and they think they were going to be winners because branding and destroying an unsuspecting woman just for a laugh made them popular.

What is the impact of the BLACKLIST on society? Example, let’s take another little word they send around, “secret hooker” or “former prostitute” about me. It is doubtful they will disclose the data entry in the first place. The standard reaction with Councils, with the GMC the General Medical Council and with many other organizations is purely a focus on PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY. Their way of thinking is that they are free to tell any number of lies, they got free hand to damage any number of people, they are free to do any crime at all, including torture and murder as long as they can plausibly deny it. So the sickness of the Local Councils is their effort to tell any lies they want and circulate any accusations as long as they don’t get caught. The NHS and the GP surgeries and the Police being recipients of the filth sent out from sick bastards data controllers, makes the Data Protection Act impossible to apply.

This is important and I established that in real life. Any Tom, Dick or Harry can get hold of the manager of my local GP surgery and tell them that I am a former prostitute and secret hooker (its in the database and therefore it is true, any filth written there counts as true as long as the Council data controller does not get caught kicking up the stink) and that I am utterly insane and should be sectioned or be monitored by a psychiatrist, purely because the system is sick. The rot and the decay between the Council and the NHS and GP is contagious. The Police could actually put an end to this rot.

But ONLY if the families of the victims get determined to reverse the decay and corruption.

Which families….? of which victims….? You will soon find out.

How did the Slough Council miscalculate their odds of success and winning this litigation, together with their insurers who paid the half a million pounds legal costs bill? Surely they did not expect to lose.

It has to do with being popular for soft killing and slow lynching of the targeted and databased victim.

I bet the Slough Council also had a RIPA directed targeted surveillance order issued against Jane Clift and with todays high technology surveillance the Council under RIPA could move in cameras that see- through walls and keep watching her from upstairs how she wipes her ass and how she changes her knickers, there are cameras like Xaver 800 and Xaver 400 that can watch the targets every move through the ceiling and record it too and keep laughing behind her back. So, the Council thought that with the filth and smut they circulate and with their super high tech directed surveillance, unsuspecting Jane was going to stay the butt of all the jokes and they were the smart guys getting all the neighbors to laugh behind her back and at her expense. I noticed in Edinburgh that some people “in the game of directed surveillance are totally addicted to watching, they just want to watch especially toilet and bathroom activities. There is criminal insanity around high tech intrusion spying , budgets for Citizen Informants and Covert Human Intelligence Sources or CHIS. I will just stop here for now.

The main terms that decent people should know are:

CHIS Covert Human Intelligence Sources

RIPA directed targeted surveillance

Extra judicial punishment

Plausible deniability

No comments: